The Pew Charitable Trusts / The Pew Environment Group

Southeast Suffered Millions in Economic Losses from Overfishing; Pew-commissioned study underscores need for protecting species


ORLANDO, Fla., Sept. 4, 2012 /PR Newswire/ --  The Southeast sustained tens of millions of dollars in economic losses during a five-year period because years of overfishing depleted species and led to fewer recreational fishing trips, according to an analysis commissioned by the Pew Environment Group.

The study, conducted by the nonprofit consulting firm Ecotrust, examined the impact of overfishing from 2005 to 2009 on nine severely depleted species, including black sea bass and red snapper, in the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, respectively.

The biggest loss in direct expenditures—nearly $53 million a year on average—came from fewer fishing trips to catch South Atlantic black sea bass. The figure represents money that was not spent on items such as boat rentals, charter fees, tackle, bait, fuel and other businesses directly dependent on anglers targeting this species. When looking at the broader economy, including spending at hotels, restaurants, wholesale suppliers and other downstream businesses, the region had a total estimated loss of $138 million because of fewer trips for black sea bass alone. For more on black sea bass see our fact sheet here.

'Overfishing—catching fish faster than they can reproduce—leaves a costly legacy that hurts our communities and fishermen,' said Lee Crockett, director of Pew's fisheries program. 'Recreational anglers are suffering the consequences of the nation's failure to wisely manage our fish resources. The Ecotrust study makes a strong economic case for the laws we have today that require science-based annual catch limits to end and prevent overfishing. These limits could help deliver robust fish populations, create jobs and put money back into our coastal communities.'

In the Gulf, where red snapper are at only 17.5 percent of a safe population level, direct spending losses amounted to an average of $13 million annually because of fewer fishing trips targeting that species. When looking at the broader economy, this loss increased to $33 million. In the South Atlantic from Florida to North Carolina, where red snapper have declined to 12.5 percent of a safe level, the total economic loss was $42 million on average per year. Click here to see a graphic of all species results and more study information.

'Red snapper has needed a lot of help to recover, and it's been a tough road, but the financial payoff is clear,' said Holly Binns, director of Pew's fisheries program in the Southeast U.S. 'Science-based catch limits appear to be working and will return this commercially important species to abundance. In the Gulf, red snapper are showing strong signs of rebounding, thanks to catch limits implemented in 2007. In the South Atlantic, they have been in critical condition but may be stabilizing, due to catch limits implemented in 2010.'

Overfishing has depleted nearly 20 percent of the nation's commercially and recreationally important ocean fish, including some species of tuna, cod, flounder, snapper and grouper. Restoring fish populations helps anglers, boosts commercial fisheries and improves the health of the region's ecosystems, which draw fishermen, divers and tourists from around the world.

'Overfishing has made it significantly tougher for me to make a living,' said Captain Bill Taylor, owner-operator of Black Dog Charters of Jupiter, Fla. 'Our local tourist economy can only benefit from staying the course of rebuilding fish populations.'

'These findings demonstrate the economic importance of recreational fishing to our economy and underscore the costly legacy of inadequate management that drove many popular recreational species to unsustainably low levels,' said Kristen Sheeran, one of the Ecotrust report authors. To see the full report, click here.

Note to reporters and editors:

The figures from each species cannot be added together for a total economic loss to the regions because fishermen often target more than one species on a trip. Adding the numbers could result in inflated figures (double counting) that are inaccurate.

This study follows an earlier Ecotrust analysis completed last year on the impact of overfishing on commercial fisheries in New England and the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions. The 2011 report showed that commercial fishermen in the Gulf and South Atlantic lost $15.2 million in 2009.  It is important to note that last year's commercial analysis was conducted differently from this new study, and thus the results cannot be compared. More information on the 2011 study is available in this fact sheet

The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nongovernmental organization that works globally to establish pragmatic, science-based policies that protect our oceans, preserve our wild lands, and promote clean energy.

For more than 20 years, Ecotrust has converted $80 million in grants into more than $500 million in capital for local people, businesses, and organizations from Alaska to California. Ecotrust's many innovations include co-founding the world's first environmental bank, starting the world's first ecosystem investment fund, creating a range of programs in fisheries, forestry, food, farms, and indigenous affairs, and developing new scientific and information tools to improve social, economic, and environmental decision making. Ecotrust works locally in ways that promise hope abroad, and it honors and supports the wisdom of Native and First Nation leadership in its work. Learn more at

Contact: Debbie Salamone 407-982-0958

SOURCE Pew Environment Group

Customer comments

No comments were found for Southeast Suffered Millions in Economic Losses from Overfishing; Pew-commissioned study underscores need for protecting species. Be the first to comment!